NRCS Participates in an Environmental Benefits Analysis
October 3, 2003
The 2002 Farm Bill substantially
increased funding levels for numerous conservation programs. The increase
was so noteworthy that it resulted in the single most significant
commitment of resources toward conservation on private lands in the
Nation’s history. The 2002 Bill saw an 80 percent increase over the 1996
Bill, totaling some $38 billion for conservation programs designed to
reduce soil erosion, preserve and restore wetlands, enhance water and air
quality, and promote wildlife habitat restoration. As a result of the
substantial increase in funding, NRCS is implementing a new system aimed
at tracking environmental benefits derived directly from those programs.
The Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002, or "Farm Bill" is the legislation which governs
Federal farm programs and is reviewed by Congress and the House of
Representatives for re-authorization every six years. It is widely known
that conservation programs will protect millions of acres and improve the
conservation of agricultural water use; however, the environmental
benefits have not been previously quantified and reported on a national
level.
"It’s important to work with
landowners in order to determine the local environmental benefits of these
programs," says Cameron Loerch, NRCS State Soil Scientist and National
Resources Inventory (NRI) Program Manager, Colorado. "Tracking the
environmental benefits of these programs will allow policy makers and
program managers to implement and modify existing programs, and to design
new programs to more effectively meet the goals of Congress and the
Department of Agriculture."
The study, called the National
Resources Inventory- Conservation Effects Assessment Project (NRI-CEAP),
will be conducted by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS).
In October 2003, NASS will contact some 10,500 farmers in 2,150 counties
across the U.S. to obtain information for the Study. "This kind of
personal contact is vital to the accuracy of the study," Loerch goes on to
say. "Only farmers and ranchers can supply the kind of information we
need."
|
|
NRI is a statistical survey designed
to help gauge natural resource status, conditions, and trends on the
nation’s non-Federal land. The NRI is currently in transition from a
5-year cycle to an annual cycle of data collection. As a part of the
transition, the NRI will be structured to capture environmental
information on all conservation programs within USDA. NRI-Conservation
Effects Assessment Project (NRI-CEAP) will provide the farming community,
the general public, the Office of Management and Budget, legislators, and
others involved with environmental policy issues an accounting of the
environmental benefits obtained from USDA conservation program
expenditures.
In the course of conducting the
pre-test of the questionnaire, NRCS field offices will assist NASS by
completing the questions regarding conservation practices and program
participation contained within the NRI CEAP survey questionnaire. NASS
staff will be visiting with NRCS staff to obtain specific information
about: 1) whether or not the selected NRI point/field has a conservation
plan; 2) what programs are associated with the conservation plan; 3) what
year the conservation plan was originally approved; 4) what is the year of
the most recent update to the plan; 5) what resource concerns are
addressed by the plan; and 6) what structural practices are included in
the plan. NASS visits to NRCS field offices will occur concurrently with
farmers’ interviews.
The scope of the project covers most
of the conservation practices implemented through EQIP, CRP, WRP, WHIP,
and NRCS conservation technical assistance. Conservation practices (or
best management practices, BMPs) that will be emphasized include the NRCS
Core 4 practices (conservation buffers, nutrient management, pest
management and tillage management) plus irrigation management practices,
drainage management practices, manure management practices, establishment
of wildlife habitat, and wetland protection and restoration.
The project is a multi-agency effort
led by NRCS. Collaborators include the Farm Service Agency (FSA), the
Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Cooperative State Research Education
and Extension Service (CSREES), the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS), and the Office of Risk Assessment and Cost Benefit
Analysis (ORACBA).
|